Built for litigation

Expert Analysis, From Intake To Settlement

Screen the matter, see what each side’s expert would say as the facts change, and build your own expert’s report faster.

Our goal: 50% lower expert costs.

Book a demo Try an example case

Or find the expert you are up against

Know the expert risk before you take the case. See Gatekeeper →

Illustrative screen · securitiesProposed securities class action

Exclusion risk: high

Data. Thin trading in 4 of 11 disclosure windows.

Court. This judge limited an event study on similar facts.

Theory fit. Two of three disclosures mix in earnings news.

Next step. Narrow the class period, then screen again.

Minutesfor a first read that takes an expert two to three weeks
50%our goal for lower expert costs, with Report Builder
Where the 50% goal comes from
- Data assembly and cleaningConsulting team today; mostly done by the builder
- First-pass models and runsConsulting team today; proposed by the builder
- DraftingDrafted from the expert's recorded decisions
- Key decisions and reviewStay with the expert, every one recorded
The saving comes from support work, not the expert’s judgment. A goal, not a measured result: Report Builder pilots measure it against comparable matters.
115expert classes, covering about 70% of US civil expert testimony
Zerodata retention: US inference, never used for training, isolated per firm
How we handle privileged material
- Never used for trainingYour matter content trains no model, ours or anyone else's.
- US processing with zero data retentionModel calls run under zero data retention, with US inference. No prompt or completion is stored.
- Isolated per firmOnly your firm's named users can reach your matters. Privileged content is never written to a log.
- Never filedInternal preparation only. Your retained expert still writes, signs and testifies.

Internal blind test

Nearly 3 times as accurate

28%

The same model, given only the case file

78%

Supreme Mind’s Expert Agents

In our internal blind test on securities event-study reports filed in 2026, our Expert Witness AI Agents reproduced 78% of the experts’ key findings on the event dates found, versus 28% for the same model given only the case file: nearly 3 times as accurate. How we tested it

What one run returns

The brief

Four sections in every brief

Likely opinion: what the expert will conclude, in their own voice
Cross-examination weaknesses: ranked, with citations to the case file
Methodology challenges: the Daubert and Rule 702 attack surface
Settlement range: how the testimony moves it, uncertainty stated

The tools

Put it to work

Cross-examination practice: rehearse the cross against their expert or your own
Expert-report stress test: find the weak points in a report before it is served
Examine the record: ask the case file a question, get an answer cited to the page

Read a sample brief →

How the AI Agents work

Five steps, every run

Pulls the record
The expert’s public record: prior reports, testimony and rulings.
Runs the analysis
The expert’s analysis on real data. For securities: market data and the event study, in code.
Checks every authority
Reads every authority in full and checks every quote against the court record, dropping what it cannot verify.
Returns the brief
The likely opinion, ranked weak points, cross-examination questions and the Rule 702 attack surface.
Rehearses the cross
Cross-examination practice against the expert agent, and a stress test of your own expert’s report before it is served.

The live cross · worked example

Put the expert on the stand before the deposition

In re Luckin Coffee Inc. Securities LitigationGrounded

Class period 2019-05-17 to 2020-04-01 · vs. Defense Event-Study Econometrician

You (counsel)

Your market model for January 31 produced an R-squared of 0.123. Correct?

Witness

That figure appears in my report.

1 of 5 questions asked.

A class of expert, never a named individual. Nothing here is filed or offered as testimony.

What it could be worth

How preparation changes the outcome

Close contested class certification fight · $300M single-damages overcharge. Both sides start at 50/50; “with” means that side prepares with Supreme Mind.

Plaintiff chance of winning

Defense without

Defense with

Plaintiff without

50%Baseline

45.2%−4.8 pts

Plaintiff with

57.2%+7.2 pts

52.4%+2.4 pts

Expected recovery

Defense without

Defense with

Plaintiff without

$32.5MBaseline

$29.2M−10.1%

Plaintiff with

$37.3M+14.7%

$33.8M+4.1%

An estimate based on public research. Find out more about how we modeled this →

Be the side that prepares better.Start free Book a demo →

The asymmetry

The same expert read, in minutes rather than weeks

What an expert's first read costs

By hand

$25,000 to $45,000

Supreme Mind

Included in an Annual Matter Planunlimited runs on the matter, for the whole team

What an expert's first read takes

By hand

2 to 3 weeks

Supreme Mind

Minutesthousands of times faster

Which matters get a read

A senior expert's first read runs to tens of thousands of dollars, so it is bought only for the matters that can carry it.

When, and how often, you get a read

Without, an expert weighs in a few times over a matter that can run for years. With, you can ask any day, at any hour, and have an answer in minutes.

Without: about 1 in 8 federal cases ever deposes an expert

With Supreme Mind

Without

IntakePleadingsDiscoveryExpert reportsDaubertResolution

An expert readA read you went without

With Supreme Mind

IntakePleadingsDiscoveryExpert reportsDaubertResolution

A read on demand, daily if you want it

See it on your own matter.Start free Read a sample brief →

Where it fits

From complaint to settlement

Stage

Without

With Supreme Mind

What improves

Case intake

Decided on the pleadings

A read before you commit

Case value rangeLower intake risk

Motion to dismiss

Their case inferred

Their case written out

Foresight

Expert retention

Sourced through networks

Retain against a brief

Sharper assignment

Discovery

One billed read

Rerun as the facts land

Live case theoryRerun whenever you need

Expert reports

Their report seen for the first time

Their attack prepared for

Stress-tested expertWeeks saved

Depositions

Cross built from reports

Cross rehearsed first

Practised cross

Daubert

Exposure found in their motion

Weak points found first

Fewer surprises

Resolution

Leverage arrives late

Leverage from intake

A range you can defend

Your retained expert still forms the opinion, signs the report and takes the stand.

Preparation compoundsRun it daily. Preparation predicts performance.

Without, it comes in stepsIt starts once an expert is retained, and grows as each paid engagement allows.

Your data

How we handle privileged material

Security & trust →

Never used for training

Your matter content trains no model, ours or anyone else's.

US processing with zero data retention

Model calls run under zero data retention, with US inference. No prompt or completion is stored.

Isolated per firm

Only your firm's named users can reach your matters. Privileged content is never written to a log.

Never filed

Internal preparation only. Your retained expert still writes, signs and testifies.

Practice areas

Practice areas we cover in depth

Each library covers the experts, methods and Daubert patterns that define a practice area.

Antitrust Litigation

Cartel, overcharge and class-wide impact

Cartel, common-impact, pass-through and market-definition economists.

Explore Antitrust →

Securities Litigation

Section 10(b), Halliburton II and Delaware Chancery

Event-study, valuation, forensic accounting, governance and pay experts.

Explore Securities →

Mass Tort

MDL, toxic tort and coordination

Causation toxicologists, epidemiologists and industrial hygienists, across asbestos, talc, PFAS and Roundup.

Explore Mass Tort →

Personal Injury

Biomechanical, medical and life-care experts

Biomechanics first, then life-care planners, earnings economists and accident reconstructionists.

Explore Personal Injury →

Commercial Litigation

Contract, partnership and arbitration

Damages quantum, forensic accounting and custom-and-practice experts, plus fact-witness rehearsal.

Explore Commercial →

All practice areas

Every practice we cover

The full map of practice areas and the experts in each.

See every practice area →

Common expert agent classes

20 questions free with a firm email

Defense event-study econometrician Cartel-overcharge damages economist Patent reasonable-royalty damages expert General-causation epidemiologist Accident reconstructionist Lost-profits damages expert Conjoint survey damages expert Medical standard-of-care expert

Browse all 115 classes →

See it free on a matter you know

Start free Read a sample brief →

Expert Analysis, From Intake To Settlement

Nearly 3 times as accurate

What one run returns

Four sections in every brief

Put it to work

Five steps, every run

Pulls the record

Runs the analysis

Checks every authority

Returns the brief

Rehearses the cross

Put the expert on the stand before the deposition

How preparation changes the outcome

The same expert read, in minutes rather than weeks

From complaint to settlement

How we handle privileged material

Never used for training

US processing with zero data retention

Isolated per firm

Never filed

Practice areas we cover in depth

Cartel, overcharge and class-wide impact

Section 10(b), Halliburton II and Delaware Chancery

MDL, toxic tort and coordination

Biomechanical, medical and life-care experts

Contract, partnership and arbitration

Every practice we cover

Common expert agent classes

See it free on a matter you know